1/You explicitly said Christians don't follow it. That is a judgment and hypocritical. You said that people of the book before and at the time of the prophet did not do Zina, which is just ridiculous because of course they did. To say that someone is not a Muslim is not something you can say. If someone practices but commits adultery, they are still Muslim. A Christian committing adultery is still a Christian and therefore your definition cannot determine who is and who is not because they break a religious law. I know English is not your first language but the way you have presented your argument or discussion comes across as hypocritical.
a Muslim ,(or someone from the people of the book) who did "Zina" ,drunk Alcohol doese'nt put him out of his commity (still consedered as a muslim, or man/women of the book).But when we say muslims by default he don't do "Zina" as it's forbidden in islam.ok the some thing for the definition of the people of the book.
2/people of the book did "Zina" before After and in the time of prophet (but not like nowadays which is freeequent.)
i didn'nt say th opposite.Muslims also did that in the time of prophet.
3/Pratically , they(People of The book ) no longer exist , ...because they are the majority of them "mushrik" they don't beleive that there is no god but Allah, ..
"Christians don't follow it": This is what Ex-Christian Men of relegion say , not me.They are persons living with you , know YOUR relegion even better than you.,
I insisted on the fact that the woman of the book she must not be a prostitute (did the sex out of marriage) because it's forbidden fr a mulsem man(that he didn't do Adultery) to marry ,and EVEN a muslim girl ,if she did Adultery .Verse 3 Chapter 24(Al nour)